How Much Money Did You Lose Gambling

Step #1: Gamble only what you can afford to lose. Step #2: Quantify how much you can afford to lose by gambling to no more than 5% of your investment profits. This way, you’ll never really lose because you are only gambling a small portion of your winnings. If you have no winnings, you aren’t allowed to gamble.

Millions of Americans love betting on sports. The sad reality is that the vast majority of them will lose money over their gambling career.

Gambling
  1. How much money did Marie Antoinette lose when she gambled? 2009-08-01 19:-08-01 19:31:40. That would probably be in records of what money she lost during gambling.
  2. Wisconsin, for example, doesn't allow any gambling losses against wins as an itemized deduction: if you lose, you lose; if you win, you lose. The Tax Code doesn't treat casual gamblers very well. On the one hand the odds are stacked against you winning (those fancy casinos were built on losers, not winners).
  3. This means you’ll lose an average of $1.41 every time you bet $100 on the come bet or pass line bet, but you’ll lose an average of $9.09 every time you bet the same amount on the hard 8. So one reason you’re losing so much money gambling is because you’re making bets on propositions where the house has a high edge.
  4. Multiply that man's losses by 17 billion, and you'll have something like the annual damage suffered by U.S. Gamblers each year, a total of $119 billion in 2013, or about the same as Americans spent.

Understanding why so many people end up in the red is a complex proposition.

With that being said, there are a few main reasons why even the most knowledgeable sports fans end up losing in the end.

In this article, I’ll lay out some of the most common reasons why only a small percentage of gamblers end up being profitable over the long run. Keep these reasons in mind and maybe you can avoid the pitfalls that have kept so many bettors from consistently winning money.

1 – Lack of a Bankroll

If you’re not familiar with the concept of a bankroll, it’s no surprise that you haven’t been able to establish a profitable betting strategy.

Your bankroll is the single-most important thing to monitor because it helps you understand the money coming in and the money going out.

If you aren’t diligently keeping track, you can find yourself down a lot of money, quickly.

Your bankroll is the pool of money from which you bet. To create one, simply set aside a pool of money that you’re comfortable losing.

Once you have that set aside, decide how much of that pool (as a percentage) you’re willing to bet on any one play. Most pros recommend between 2% and 5%, but you can make this determination for yourself based on the size of your bankroll.

While simply having a bankroll isn’t going to turn you into a money-making machine, it will make you aware of the financial aspect. It will also help you treat sports gambling more like a business and less like a hobby. When you’re aware of the numbers, you’re more thoughtful in your plays.

2 – You Chase Losses

Chasing losses is the practice of trying to win back your losses by doubling down on your next bet.

If you lose $200 betting on three games, you might bet $200 on the fourth game in an attempt to win back your money.
How Much Money Did You Lose Gambling

This is obviously a big, yet common, mistake.

How Much Money Did You Lose Gambling

Chasing your losses doesn’t just often result in massive financial loss, but it ignores a key principle of sports gambling—the long-term mindset.

The way to become one of the few who end up profiting from sports betting is to remember that sticking around is important. Assuming that you’re going to keep on betting regardless of your outcomes, you need to minimize your losses to give yourself a chance to win in the end.

Do everything in your power to avoid having to “reload” your bankroll after you’ve lost it all and you’ll realize the importance of making small bets.

3 – You Bet Without a Reason

I understand that betting on sports is a form of gambling like roulette or blackjack. However, unlike those games, sports betting isn’t necessarily a game of chance.

If you’re betting on sports simply by choosing a team and letting the chips fall where they may, you’re losing the very real advantages that can be gained by doing research.

Before placing a bet, ask yourself why you’re making a certain play.

Take into account all the information available to you.

Sportsbooks depend on an uninformed public to make their money. They rely on bettors to make their plays based on feelings and hunches rather than real data. Think critically about why you’re making a play and you can avoid falling into this trap.

While it’s true that two informed bettors can end up taking different sides on a play, that doesn’t mean gathering information isn’t important. Before you make your next bet, make sure you have a concrete set of reasons for why you chose the team you’re betting on.

4 – You Always Choose Favorites

Generally speaking, the public has a major bias towards choosing favorites. It’s not hard to see why the favorite will usually win the game outright, and it’s a mental trick to realize that winning, in no way, equals covering. Simply put, people don’t like betting on teams that are probably going to lose, regardless of the spread.

This presents a tremendous opportunity for bettors to take advantage of underdogs.

Because the public bets so heavily on the favorite and the sportsbooks want to even up the money, often times, that will cause the spread to grow. The underdog will get more points than they “should.”

I don’t want to make the blanket statement of saying the underdog is always the better play. Just be sure that you’re betting underdogs at the same rate as you’re playing favorites.

5 – You Bet to Win the Game and Forget Value

Everyone likes to win their bets, but winning more than half your bets does not equal winning money.

Betting for value is a simple concept that’s hard in practice. Value betting means not risking significantly more money than you stand to win on any given play.

If you’re routinely betting on favorites at -600, there’s not much value.

Sure, you’re going to win most of them, but the money you’ll win doesn’t outweigh the risk. Taking huge favorites on the moneyline means that one loss can derail your entire bankroll.

On the flip side, betting the moneyline on underdogs can mean you might lose more than half your bets, but still win money in the end.

This isn’t to say that it’s wise to bet moneyline underdogs at +500, but if you’re able to find some matchups where the underdog is around +150 to +200, consider mixing it in.

Additionally, if you take the time to actually track your winnings, you’ll recognize that you can overcome losses if you consistently bet for value.

Much like the public’s tendency to have a bias towards betting favorites because they’re more likely to win, the public also has a bias towards winning bets over winning money.

Next time you sit down and lay out your plays for NFL Sunday, remember that if you’re risking way more than you stand to gain, it might not be worth it to make the play.

How Much Money Did You Lose Gambling Per

6 – You Only Use One Sportsbook

With today’s increasingly accepting laws regarding sports gambling, there’s no shortage of sportsbooks to use for your plays. Take advantage of all the offerings by line shopping.

Line shopping is simple.

When you have a play in mind, visit different betting sites to find out which one has the best odds for your play.

Because sportsbooks work to even up the money, it’s likely that different books will have different odds based on the action they’ve received for a particular game. This is especially true of the moneyline, which typically varies more significantly across sportsbooks.

If you’re betting on a favorite and they’re listed at -145 on one sportsbook, there’s a good chance that, if you shop around, you’ll be able to find them at -140, -135, or better somewhere else.

While the spread is usually a little more set-in-stone across different sites, there’s still a chance you might be able to steal half a point or even a full point if you look around. At the end of the day, you have nothing to lose by looking for better odds somewhere else. In the end, even small advantages pay off over time.

Conclusion

How Much Money Did You Lose Gambling Today

If you’ve been having a rough year betting on sports, it’s likely that you’ve been committing some of these betting faux pas along the way. These weaknesses in the general public’s betting strategy can be turned into opportunities if you’re willing to put in the time necessary to be successful.

How Much Money Can You Lose Gambling

Odds are that you imagine gamblers as people simply trying to get lucky and win a big payoff. But when Natasha Schull, an associate professor in MIT’s Program in Science, Technology, and Society (STS), began researching the lives of gamblers in Las Vegas, she found a very different motivation at work.
Take, for instance, Mollie, a mother and hotel worker who compulsively played video poker, running through her paychecks in two-day binges, and cashing in her life insurance to get more money to play. “The thing people never understand is that I’m not playing to win,” Mollie told Schull. Instead, Mollie’s goal was to enter a state of total gambling immersion: “to keep playing — to stay in that machine zone where nothing else matters.”
Now, in her new book, Addiction by Design, published this month by Princeton University Press, Schull delves into the lives of such gamblers. In particular, she looks at compulsive machine gamblers — not the folks playing social games around a table, such as poker, but those who play alone at electronic slot-machine terminals. For a small percentage of the population, these games become an all-consuming pursuit, a way of shutting out the world and its problems for long, long stretches of time.
But eventually, most compulsive machine gamblers recognize the hold that high-tech gaming has come to have over them. As one gambling addict told Schull: “I could say that for me the machine is a lover, a friend, a date, but really it’s none of those things; it’s a vacuum cleaner that sucks the life out of me, and sucks me out of life.”
Schull thinks this point — that for machine gamblers, it’s not about the money, but the escape into the “zone,” as Mollie and other gamblers call it — has eluded politicians who wrangle over casino openings and expansions throughout the United States, where more than 30 states currently have some form of legalized machine gambling.
“It’s a real stumbling block for policymakers to understand that,” Schull says. She adds: “Everyone believes the harm is how much money is spent, and that what’s driving the compulsive gamblers is a desire to make money. But … the ‘zone’ is really what’s driving this experience. The idea of winning money falls away when you get to the point of addiction.”
We’ve all visited the ‘zone’ — but few people live there
Schull’s book is the culmination of a long process of research: She started delving into the subject in the early 1990s, when she wrote an undergraduate thesis at the University of California at Berkeley on the ways casino architecture helped drive customers to gamble more. By the late 1990s, she had moved to Las Vegas to conduct research on compulsive gamblers, talking to a vast number of addicts and industry executives, and even working in a gambling-addiction treatment program.
The phenomenon Schull wound up studying is both one that most of us can relate to — we’ve all tuned out the world while online, or playing games — and one that gets carried to extremes in gambling addicts.
“This experience of being in the zone is one we’ve all had, whether it’s eBay auctions or sitting on the train compulsively using our phones,” says Schull, an anthropologist by training.
On the other hand, “disordered gambling,” as the American Psychiatric Association now calls gambling addiction, seems to afflict just 1 to 2 percent of Americans, according to studies.
Yet according to a long string of studies, and as Schull notes in her book, those people can generate 30 to 60 percent of revenues for the machine-gambling business. In Addiction by Design, Schull chronicles not only the nature of gambling addiction, but also the ways in which the gaming industry has deployed sophisticated technology to create machines that are extraordinarily compelling for players.
The newest video slot machines, for instance, deliver a frequent stream of small wins rather than infrequent large jackpots. Why? Because after immersion in electronic slot machines, many users resemble one gambler Schull studied at length, who “felt irritated when she won, because it took time for the jackpot to go up, so she had to sit there — and her flow was interrupted,” Schull says. “It’s the flow of the experience that people are after. Money to them is a means to sit there longer, not an end. They don’t win a jackpot and leave, they win a jackpot and sit there until it’s gone.”
Talking to gamblers themselves, Schull notes, provided “great insight” into the phenomenon of gambling addiction. “There were no real dupes. There was no single person who tried to tell me, ‘I have a system, I have it figured out.’ These were jaded, savvy, aware people. They were not sitting there expecting to win.”
Meanwhile, of gambling industry employees, such as game designers, Schull says, “You’ve got really intelligent guys focused on making technology work, and they don’t think about the larger consequences.” She adds: “Not one of these people is sitting there saying, ‘How can we addict people?’ They are talking about how to increase profits … [and they] insulate themselves ethically from the outcome as best they can.”
‘People lose track of time and space’
Scholars who have read the book praise its exploration of the psyche of gamblers. Tanya Luhrmann, an anthropologist at Stanford University, lauds the way it “captures the intense relationship between humans and machines that is so much part of what people call the addiction experience.” Luhrmann adds that until reading Addiction by Design, she “hadn’t realized gambling was so much about the experience” of playing, rather than winning.
Schull’s research had attracted considerable attention well in advance of the book’s publication: She has appeared on “60 Minutes” and testified about the subject in front of the Massachusetts state legislature.
Yet Schull holds off on offering specific regulatory remedies concerning the way games should be structured. In some countries, legislators have suggested slowing down the pace of electronic slot machines to stretch out payoffs and water down the intensity of the experience — a technological fix Schull calls “wrongheaded” because it may simply encourage gamblers to play for longer periods using an equal amount of money.
Machine gambling, Schull emphasizes, “is not like buying a movie ticket or making a purchase at a store and then going home. This is rapid, fast, continuous spending where people lose track of time and space, and their ability to make decisions shifts over the course of the encounter.”
Instead, Schull asks, “Given the nature of this product and this interface, shouldn’t policymakers, state legislatures, be learning a little bit more about how this product affects people?” She adds: “I think my work is part of an emerging conversation.”